{"id":8136,"date":"2024-08-19T23:02:21","date_gmt":"2024-08-19T23:02:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/2024\/08\/19\/harris-one-ups-trump-on-populist-plays\/"},"modified":"2024-08-19T23:02:21","modified_gmt":"2024-08-19T23:02:21","slug":"harris-one-ups-trump-on-populist-plays","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/2024\/08\/19\/harris-one-ups-trump-on-populist-plays\/","title":{"rendered":"Harris one-ups Trump on populist plays"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Vice President Kamala Harris\u2019s recent anti-price-gouging push has met with significant skepticism from policy analysts and even some normally politically aligned commentators.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">They\u2019ve suggested that her somewhat vague \u201cfederal ban on price gouging\u201d to combat inflation is unworkable, counterproductive, a \u201cgimmick\u201d and pandering. Many have noted that Richard M. Nixon tried price controls in August 1971, and it went poorly.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">In fact, Nixon had just months earlier privately conceded that price controls \u2014 and I\u2019m skipping over some Nixonian colorful language here \u2014 \u201cwill not work.\u201d But he pressed forward anyway, apparently for political reasons.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">The Nixon comparison isn\u2019t totally apt, and Harris seemed to temper her proposal somewhat when it was actually rolled out.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">But there\u2019s a reason Nixon pulled a 180, and there\u2019s clearly a political reason for Harris to play up this issue, pander or not.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">It\u2019s because lots and lots of Americans blame price gouging for inflation. (Whether such gouging actually exists is a point of contention, but the Federal Trade Commission has said some large grocery chains have increased prices more than needed to cover extra costs.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">And lots and lots of Americans like the idea of the federal government doing something about it. That appears to include when you use the language favored by its critics, \u201cprice controls.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Americans blame lots of things for inflation. But price gouging is perhaps the perceived culprit where the most bipartisan consensus emerges.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">A late 2021 Fox News poll showed 75 percent of Americans blamed \u201cprice gouging by companies\u201d at least somewhat. That was nearly as much as the 78 percent that blamed the most obvious culprit, the coronavirus pandemic.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">About 4 in 10 Republicans, Democrats and independents agreed that price gouging was \u201cvery responsible\u201d for inflation. And independents were more apt to blame price gouging than they were to blame even President Joe Biden.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">More recent polling suggests price gouging has grown as a boogeyman:<\/p>\n<p><span>A YouGov survey released in July 2023 showed Americans\u2019 No. 1 inflation offender \u2014 out of 11 factors mentioned \u2014 was \u201clarge corporations seeking maximum profits.\u201d Even 44 percent of Republicans blamed that \u201ca lot.\u201d<\/span><br \/>\n<span>A late 2023 Ipsos\/Yahoo Finance poll showed price gouging was independents\u2019 top culprit among seven options.<\/span><br \/>\n<span>And a Financial Times\/Michigan Ross poll this year showed those blaming large corporations for charging more amid inflation rising from 54 percent six months earlier to 63 percent. That was significantly more than the 38 percent who blamed Democrats\u2019 policies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Americans also see government action as both effective and desirable.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">That YouGov poll showed about half of Americans thought that having the government set price limits (51 percent) and fining companies for price gouging (49 percent) would at least probably decrease inflation. Significantly fewer \u2014 about 3 in 10 \u2014 felt these ideas wouldn\u2019t work. (The rest offered no opinion.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">The only ideas perceived as being more effective, out of 16 tested, were increasing oil production and investing in the supply chain \u2014 and only marginally so.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Just because people think these things would work doesn\u2019t necessarily mean they want them, of course. There is risk in Harris\u2019s proposal looking heavy-handed and too big-government. Donald Trump over the weekend labeled Harris\u2019s idea \u201cSOVIET Style Price Controls.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">But people do say they want such measures \u2014 even when you characterize them as \u201cprice controls.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">A late 2023 CBS News\/YouGov poll asked whether people approved of \u201cgovernment price controls \u2014 that is, laws that limit the amount that companies can raise prices, or charge for products and services.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Americans approved nearly 2-to-1, and even a majority of Republicans (56 percent) approved.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">You begin to see why such a proposal, however practical or seriously intended, would have appeal for the Harris campaign. It\u2019s not just a potent boogeyman; it\u2019s a potent boogeyman that deflects blame from the administration that has been in charge these past 3\u00bd years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">And the Harris campaign has surely demonstrated a willingness to play up the populism and take some liberties in its appeals to voters.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Its recent plan to get rid of taxes on tips \u2014 after Trump proposed a different version of the same thing \u2014 appeared calculated to offset any potential benefit Trump might glean in Nevada, a swing state featuring many service workers. But some experts say neither proposal is likely to be enacted, and they\u2019re skeptical they\u2019d even work.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Judging by these numbers, Harris might have just one-upped Trump on the populism.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vice President Kamala Harris\u2019s recent anti-price-gouging push has met with significant skepticism from policy analysts and even some normally politically aligned commentators. They\u2019ve suggested that her somewhat vague \u201cfederal ban on price gouging\u201d to combat inflation is unworkable, counterproductive, a \u201cgimmick\u201d and pandering. Many have noted that Richard M. Nixon tried price controls in August [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":8137,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8136"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8136\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8137"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}