{"id":6751,"date":"2024-07-25T23:02:07","date_gmt":"2024-07-25T23:02:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/2024\/07\/25\/new-york-prosecutor-files-opposition-to-reversing-trumps-conviction\/"},"modified":"2024-07-25T23:02:07","modified_gmt":"2024-07-25T23:02:07","slug":"new-york-prosecutor-files-opposition-to-reversing-trumps-conviction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/2024\/07\/25\/new-york-prosecutor-files-opposition-to-reversing-trumps-conviction\/","title":{"rendered":"New York prosecutor files opposition to reversing Trump\u2019s conviction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">NEW YORK \u2014 Donald Trump\u2019s falsifying business records conviction should not be reversed because of the Supreme Court\u2019s recent presidential immunity ruling for reasons including a wealth of incriminating evidence, prosecutors said in a court filing made public Thursday.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg\u2019s office wrote that the Supreme Court\u2019s decision giving broad meaning to presidential immunity involving formal duties does not have any bearing on the May jury verdict that found Trump guilty on 34 felony counts for illegally trying to conceal the nature of a hush money payment to an adult-film actress shortly before the 2016 election.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Trump\u2019s lawyers have argued that jurors were improperly exposed to witness testimony and records that were generated in 2017, his first year in office, that were extensions of the former president\u2019s official duties. Prosecutors said the nation\u2019s highest court did not hand down any finding that should disturb the verdict or see the case dismissed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">\u201cThe Supreme Court\u2019s recent ruling thus has nothing to say about defendant\u2019s conviction,\u2019 lawyers for Bragg\u2019s office wrote. \u201cBut even if that decision required the exclusion of all of the evidence that defendant cites here, there would still need be no basis for disturbing the verdict because of the other overwhelming evidence of defendant\u2019s guilt.\u2019<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan delayed Trump\u2019s sentencing more than two months until Sept. 18 to give defense lawyers time to formally argue that evidence used by Bragg\u2019s trial team was not admissible under the immunity doctrine which prohibits prosecution based on a president\u2019s official acts.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">The U.S. Supreme Court issued its controversial ruling July 1. The court ruled 6-3 along ideological lines that a president can\u2019t face prosecution for official acts or through the use of evidence related to official conduct. Private conduct is not covered by that protection.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">With the new timeline, the Republican presidential nominee could receive a jail sentence less than two months before the November election. He could also get a non-jail sentence or a sentence that is stayed pending the outcome of his appeal.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">If Merchan upholds the verdict, the matter could be locked up in appeals until well after the election. An appeals court could stay enforcement of Trump\u2019s sentencing.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Defense lawyers have argued that a significant amount of the evidence used against Trump at trial  involved presidential actions and should have been excluded. The indictment should be dismissed altogether, they said, because the district attorney\u2019s case has been intertwined with prohibited evidence since the case was presented to a grand jury last year.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">The defense argued recently that Bragg\u2019s office relied heavily \u201con official-acts evidence, including witness testimony regarding events in the Oval Office that [the prosecution] described as \u2018devastating.\u2019 \u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Bragg\u2019s reply to Trump\u2019s motion said \u201cevidence that [Trump] claims is affected by the Supreme Court\u2019s ruling constitutes only a sliver of the mountains of testimony and documentary proof that the jury considered in finding him guilty of all 34 felony charges beyond a reasonable doubt.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">A federal court judge has already ruled that Bragg\u2019s case against Trump had nothing to do with his presidency. U.S. District Court Judge Alvin Hellerstein last year denied Trump\u2019s bid to have the case transferred to federal court partially on that basis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Separately, a New York civil judge on Thursday refused to step down from oversight of a wide-ranging business fraud case that resulted in a $450 million finding against Trump and his company. Judge Arthur Engoron defended himself against a claim by a lawyer not involved in the case, who told a news outlet that he had influence over Engoron.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Engoron wrote in his ruling that the attorney subjected him to a \u201c90-second, unsolicited diatribe about a law\u201d in the courthouse lobby and it had no impact on his bench trial verdict.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW YORK \u2014 Donald Trump\u2019s falsifying business records conviction should not be reversed because of the Supreme Court\u2019s recent presidential immunity ruling for reasons including a wealth of incriminating evidence, prosecutors said in a court filing made public Thursday. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg\u2019s office wrote that the Supreme Court\u2019s decision giving broad meaning to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":6752,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6751","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6751","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6751"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6751\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6752"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6751"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6751"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6751"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}