{"id":2234,"date":"2024-03-18T12:03:40","date_gmt":"2024-03-18T12:03:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/2024\/03\/18\/president-bidens-400000-tax-pledge-has-a-magic-asterisk\/"},"modified":"2024-03-18T12:03:40","modified_gmt":"2024-03-18T12:03:40","slug":"president-bidens-400000-tax-pledge-has-a-magic-asterisk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/2024\/03\/18\/president-bidens-400000-tax-pledge-has-a-magic-asterisk\/","title":{"rendered":"President Biden\u2019s $400,000 tax pledge has a \u2018magic asterisk\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">\u201cThe budget reduces the deficit by about $3 trillion by making our tax code fairer.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">\u2014 White House budget director Shalanda Young, in remarks to reporters, March 11<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">A White House budget plan is aspirational and political \u2014 a wish list of policies that often fare poorly on Capitol Hill when the real spending bills are written. The Fact Checker spent many years as an economics and budget reporter and knows that although the numbers may add up in a White House budget, the assumptions are often dubious.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">One favorite accounting gimmick of Ronald Reagan was dubbed the \u201cmagic asterisk.\u201d These were spending cuts that would be identified later \u2014 but never were.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">In his 2025 budget plan released last week, President Biden has a magic asterisk of his own. He promises he will uphold one of his most famous campaign promises from 2020 \u2014 not raising taxes on anyone making less than $400,000 \u2014 but never explains how he will pay for it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Let\u2019s explain.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Running for president, Biden was emphatic: \u201cNobody making under 400,000 bucks would have their taxes raised. Period. Bingo,\u201d he declared on May 22, 2020. To pay for major new social programs, Biden proposed trillions of dollars in tax increases on the very wealthy and corporations, but his pledge helped shield him from Republican attacks that he would raise taxes on the middle class.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">That promise is now under pressure.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Whoever is elected president this year will face a fiscal crisis next year \u2014 tax cuts signed by Donald Trump in 2017 will expire, meaning everyone\u2019s taxes will go up sharply if Congress does not act.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Why would tax cuts expire? Because of an accounting gimmick. The revenue loss from tax cuts is measured over 10-year periods because of Senate rules, and Republicans wanted to pass more tax cuts than they could officially afford. So Trump and the GOP Congress enacted a tax cut that expired after just nine years so it would seem smaller than in reality.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Biden opposed the 2017 tax cut so he has no problem with taxes on the wealthy going up. But letting the whole tax cut expire would violate his pledge to people making less than $400,000.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">\u201cThis was one of the most egregious and fiscally reckless budget decisions in modern history,\u201d Biden\u2019s 2025 budget says. \u201cThe President, faced with this fiscally irresponsible legacy, will work with the Congress to address the 2025 expirations, and focus tax policy on rewarding work not wealth.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Among the principles the president listed to guide this debate is a commitment to handle the problem in a \u201cfiscally responsible manner\u201d by paying for \u201cextending tax cuts for people earning less than $400,000 with additional reforms to ensure that wealthy people and big corporations pay their fair share.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">But the budget does not specify how Biden would do that. To fund proposals for social programs, the 2025 plan already has a bevy of tax increases on the wealthy and companies, including a billionaire wealth tax. It proposes imposing a top tax rate of 39.6 percent for people making more than $400,000 and increasing a tax on investments for people making more than $400,000.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Moreover, the cost of fulfilling this pledge is going to be expensive.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">The White House has not produced a number but, using a 2023 Congressional Budget Office estimate and a 2022 Tax Policy Center estimate of the percentage of the tax cut that goes to the wealthy, we roughly calculate that at least $1.7 trillion in new revenue over 10 years would be needed to make sure there are no tax hikes on people making less than $400,000. (The math is complicated because the numbers change depending on the 10-year budget window and because it is unclear how many Americans have been pushed into the over-$400,000 tax bracket in the past two years.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">As examples of how Biden would pay for this, White House officials pointed, by way of illustration, to three tax increases that Biden has proposed in the past that are not in his budget. We will cite somewhat outdated 10-year revenue estimates, so the numbers are probably slightly higher now.<\/p>\n<p><span>Impose an additional 5 percent tax rate above income of $10 million, and then an additional 3 percent above income of $25 million ($190 billion)<\/span><span>Limit itemized deductions for high-income taxpayers ($350 billion)<\/span><span>Roll back estate tax exemptions to 2009 parameters ($250 billion)<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">That adds up to about $800 billion \u2014 only halfway there.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">White House officials insist that they can credibly claim the president\u2019s budget includes $3 trillion in deficit reduction, despite the failure to identify ways to pay for the president\u2019s $400,000 promise, because the budget says he is committed to making sure any fix is revenue neutral.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">As a technical matter, inflation had partially eroded Biden\u2019s promise as wage increases have pushed more people into the $400,000 tax bracket. A salary of $333,000 in 2020 would be worth $400,000 in today\u2019s dollars. The White House is sticking with $400,000, saying it affects only the top 2 percent of taxpayers. (Other estimates suggest it could be as much as 5 percent). However, the budget would make the new top rate adjust each year with inflation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">\u201cThe Trump tax cuts added $2 trillion to the debt with unpaid giveaways skewed to the wealthy and large corporations, and now Congressional Republicans are proposing to add another $3 trillion to the debt by extending them,\u201d said White House spokesperson Michael Kikukawa. \u201cPresident Biden\u2019s approach couldn\u2019t be more different. He is fighting to cut taxes for working families and the middle class \u2014 standing by his commitment to never raise taxes on households earning less than $400,000 \u2014 while responsibly reducing the deficit by making the wealthy and large corporations pay their fair share.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">As we said, a White House budget is mostly a messaging document. To pay for many popular programs and to claim $3 trillion in deficit reduction, the budget is silent on how Biden would keep his promise not to raise taxes on people making less than $400,000 in a revenue-neutral way. That may be smart politics but it\u2019s incomplete budgeting, especially because the cost of keeping that pledge is nearly $2 trillion over 10 years. If the president is reelected, he will struggle to meet that promise without giving up on other priorities.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">(About our rating scale)<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Send us facts to check by filling out this form<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Sign up for The Fact Checker weekly newsletter<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-cYdRxM wpds-c-cYdRxM-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">The Fact Checker is a verified signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network code of principles<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>This post appeared first on The Washington Post<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cThe budget reduces the deficit by about $3 trillion by making our tax code fairer.\u201d \u2014 White House budget director Shalanda Young, in remarks to reporters, March 11 A White House budget plan is aspirational and political \u2014 a wish list of policies that often fare poorly on Capitol Hill when the real spending bills [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":2235,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2234","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2234","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2234"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2234\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2235"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2234"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2234"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2234"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}