{"id":10013,"date":"2024-09-24T01:02:28","date_gmt":"2024-09-24T01:02:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/2024\/09\/24\/trump-likens-dojs-jan-6-filing-to-pre-election-special-counsel-report\/"},"modified":"2024-09-24T01:02:28","modified_gmt":"2024-09-24T01:02:28","slug":"trump-likens-dojs-jan-6-filing-to-pre-election-special-counsel-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/2024\/09\/24\/trump-likens-dojs-jan-6-filing-to-pre-election-special-counsel-report\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump likens DOJ\u2019s Jan. 6 filing to pre-election special counsel report"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Lawyers for Donald Trump on Monday opposed prosecutors\u2019 request to file an up-to-180-page legal brief this week explaining why the former president\u2019s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election should not be immune from criminal prosecution, claiming that such a filing would be tantamount to releasing a special counsel report six weeks before the 2024 election.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Prosecutors asked U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on Saturday for permission to file the unusually long legal motion, arguing that the Supreme Court in a July ruling on presidential immunity required her as Trump\u2019s trial judge to decide what allegations and evidence against him could be admissible. The filing is a key part of the criminal case alleging Trump illegally attempted to overturn Joe Biden\u2019s electoral victory, and it was expected to reveal new details of the evidence investigators had gathered.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">But prosecutors spelled out a plan where the filing could be kept from public view, at least initially, undercutting the Trump legal team\u2019s contention that it would be akin to an election upending special counsel report. They proposed that the filing \u2014 which would include up to 90 pages of previously disclosed evidence and newly alleged facts, as well as another 30 pages of footnotes \u2014 could be made under seal, and a public version with redactions could be released only later with Chutkan\u2019s approval.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">\u201cThe Court has been directed to conduct a detailed, factbound, and thorough analysis of the Government\u2019s case to make appropriate immunity determinations,\u201d prosecutors Thomas P. Windom and Molly Gaston wrote in a three-page request. \u201cThe Government believes that a comprehensive brief by the Government will be of great assistance to the Court in creating that robust record.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Trump\u2019s defense urged Chutkan to reject prosecutors\u2019 request, claiming that special counsel Jack Smith\u2019s plan was \u201cfundamentally unfair\u201d and made in service of a \u201cpolitically motivated agenda.\u201d Trump\u2019s lawyers have argued that as the defendant, the former president should have the right to choose what immunity claims to press \u2014 beginning with a bid to toss out a new, trimmed-down indictment prosecutors brought after the Supreme Court\u2019s July 1 decision. They said he should be able to do so in his preferred order, although prosecutors complained that could bog down his case for years in successive appeals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Trump lawyers John Lauro and Todd Blanche wrote in a nine-page filing that prosecutors\u2019 proposed opening immunity brief \u201cwould be tantamount to a premature and improper Special Counsel report,\u201d presenting \u201clegal conclusions contrary to the presumption of innocence [and] privacy concerns for potential witnesses and uncharged parties.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">They said allowing the government to file under seal would create an unfair \u201cclosed record,\u201d even as they argued against a public filing. Making parts of the motion public, they asserted, would intrude on the power and authority of the presidency that the Supreme Court ruled must not be violated, aggravate the purported unfairness of a court gag order on Trump\u2019 First Amendment rights to speak about case-related allegations, and breach Justice Department guidelines that generally counsel prosecutors from timing actions that could impact the outcome of an election. Justice Department officials have interpreted these guidelines as asking them not to take overt steps with possible political implications in criminal cases within 60 or 90 days of an election.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">\u201cThe Special Counsel\u2019s Office is seeking to release voluminous conclusions to the public, without allowing President Trump to confront their witnesses and present his own, to ensure the document\u2019s public release prior to the 2024 Presidential election,\u201d Blanche and Lauro wrote. Prosecutors cannot be permitted to issue \u201ca 180-page false hit piece\u201d that does not respond to a defense motion and risks tainting the proceedings, they said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wpds-c-heFNVF wpds-c-heFNVF-iPJLV-css overrideStyles font-copy\">Chutkan now must consider whether to stick to a court schedule she set earlier this month requiring the filing by 5 p.m. Thursday, to allow prosecutors to file the longer brief, and whether and when to make some portions public.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lawyers for Donald Trump on Monday opposed prosecutors\u2019 request to file an up-to-180-page legal brief this week explaining why the former president\u2019s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election should not be immune from criminal prosecution, claiming that such a filing would be tantamount to releasing a special counsel report six weeks before [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":10014,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10013","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10013"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10013\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10014"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10013"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstriumphs.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}